<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oxagile Software Development Company Web Application Development Blog &#187; programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.oxagile.com/tag/programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.oxagile.com</link>
	<description>Web and Mobile Application Development Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>14 technologies that won’t become obsolete before 2014: foundations of software development</title>
		<link>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/25/14-technologies-that-won%e2%80%99t-become-obsolete-before-2014-foundations-of-software-development/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/25/14-technologies-that-won%e2%80%99t-become-obsolete-before-2014-foundations-of-software-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software development methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prospects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VB.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oxagile.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
   The impact of recent changes in the world economy changed the situation in world of software. Now the majority of developers are focused on short-term work. But it doesn’t mean that they are careless about their prospects. Self-education and  experience are still the only way to success. That is why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
   <span class = "facebook-like-this" style = "height: px"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/25/14-technologies-that-won%e2%80%99t-become-obsolete-before-2014-foundations-of-software-development/&layout=standard&show_faces=false&width=100%&action=like&colorscheme=light&locale=en_US&font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100%px; height:px"></iframe></span><p>The impact of recent changes in the world economy changed the situation in world of software. Now the majority of developers are focused on short-term work. But it doesn’t mean that they are careless about their prospects. Self-education and  experience are still the only way to success. That is why it’s so important to be constantly analyzing existing technologies and methodologies trying to keep step with changeable IT- world, not wasting valuable time for unnecessary knowledge and superseded information.</p>
<p>So we will try to forecast the most essential skills for developers that won’t become obsolete in the next five-six years. In this and the next posts we will list 14 the most relevant technologies for <a href="http://store.oxagile.com/">software developers</a>.</p>
<p><strong>#1-3: Java, PHP, .NET</strong></p>
<p>It’s highly unlikely that three foundations of <a href="http://www.oxagile.com">software development</a>, Java, PHP, .NET, will be in less demand in the near future. Developers need to know at least one of these programming languages and development platforms: <a href="http://www.oxagile.com/expertise/by-technology">Java, .NET (VB.NET or C #), or PHP</a>. Nevertheless only one programming language syntax is not enough. Usually projects cover a wide range of different functions, so developers need to know the frameworks and libraries associated with the necessary functionality in more details.</p>
<p><em>to be continued…</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/25/14-technologies-that-won%e2%80%99t-become-obsolete-before-2014-foundations-of-software-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abnormal programming: LISP-like programming is our new art</title>
		<link>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/03/abnormal-programming-lisp-like-programming-is-our-new-art/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/03/abnormal-programming-lisp-like-programming-is-our-new-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IPTV software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software development methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet-video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Lyambdin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LISt Processing Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenGL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oxagile.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
   Lisp (or LISP – LISt Processing Language) is a family of programming languages with a distinctive, parenthesized syntax. It has very old history (was specified in 1958 year, only Fortran is older). Nevertheless programmers use it even nowadays!
Of course, Lisp has undergone a great changes since its appearance, it originated some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
   <span class = "facebook-like-this" style = "height: px"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/03/abnormal-programming-lisp-like-programming-is-our-new-art/&layout=standard&show_faces=false&width=100%&action=like&colorscheme=light&locale=en_US&font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100%px; height:px"></iframe></span><p>Lisp (or LISP – LISt Processing Language) is a family of <a href="http://www.oxagile.com/expertise/by-solutions">programming languages</a> with a distinctive, parenthesized syntax. It has very old history (was specified in 1958 year, only Fortran is older). Nevertheless programmers use it even nowadays!</p>
<p>Of course, Lisp has undergone a great changes since its appearance, it originated some dialects (today the most popular of them are Common Lisp and Scheme).</p>
<p>The Lisp-code is written as s-expressions (parenthesized lists), the operator&#8217;s name or function goes first, and then we use arguments. But it’s better to see it all in practice. Especially in this unrealistic performance that was possible with the help of LISP and OpenGL (enjoy the <a href="http://internet-tv.oxagile.com/index.html">internet-video</a>).</p>
<p>Be patient and you will see something impressive, it will start somewhere after the 5th minute. This real work of art was created by the winner of international awards, programmer Ivan Lyambdin:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="302" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2735394&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="302" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2735394&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<a style="text-decoration: line-through;" rel="nofollow" href="http://vimeo.com/2735394">Day of the Triffords</a> from <a style="text-decoration: line-through;" rel="nofollow" href="http://vimeo.com/user1006267">Andrew Sorensen</a> on <a style="text-decoration: line-through;" rel="nofollow" href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>How do you like the video? As you see LISP-like programming can be used not only for <a href="http://www.oxagile.com/">software development</a>, but also for creation of real beauty. <img src='http://blog.oxagile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/04/03/abnormal-programming-lisp-like-programming-is-our-new-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most famous woman in IT</title>
		<link>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/01/26/the-most-famous-woman-in-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/01/26/the-most-famous-woman-in-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Project management in IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software development methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frances Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grace Murray Hopper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joanna Rutkowska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oxagile.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
   On February, 21 the Association for Computing Machinery (acm.org) declared the name of the laureate of the Prize – one of the most prestige science award in the IT sphere. For the first time the laureate of this award was a woman &#8211;  a 75 year-old Frances Allen. She has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
   <span class = "facebook-like-this" style = "height: px"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/01/26/the-most-famous-woman-in-it/&layout=standard&show_faces=false&width=100%&action=like&colorscheme=light&locale=en_US&font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100%px; height:px"></iframe></span><p>On February, 21 the Association for Computing Machinery (acm.org) declared the name of the laureate of the Prize – one of the most prestige science award in the IT sphere. For the first time the laureate of this award was a woman &#8211;  a 75 year-old Frances Allen. She has worked for IBM  since 1975. Missis Allen took part in research-and-development activities in the field of parallel computing, that is used in  most computing machinery.<br />
<img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" title="frances allen - the most fomus woman in IT" src="http://tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:NpaVlYoD_mjWaM:http://www.techshout.com/images/frances-allen.jpg" alt="" width="89" height="111" /><br />
In 1989 г. Allen was the first woman who got oneself into the list of the IBM Fellow – the most prestigious technical status in the corporation.</p>
<p>The example of Frances Allen isn&#8217;t the only example of a woman who achieved success in the IT sphere.</p>
<p>Many critics think that the first developer was a woman. Lovelace Augusta Ada King had become a programmer long before the first computers were invented. She was a mathematician and she was interested in the works of Charles Bebbidge who created the project  “Analytical engine“ &#8211; theoretical footing of the first computer creation. Lovelace translated from French to English the famous work of Menabrea in 1842 and added her comments to it.  Her comments to this work were very useful for the science development – there were a lot of methods of practical application of computers and argumentation about entertaining application of computers. Also Ada wrote her own method of Bernulli numbers’ calculation , that is known as the first famous computer program. Ada is the author of such terms in <a href="http://www.oxagile.com">modern programming</a> as subprogramme, circle, working cell and etc.<br />
<span id="more-315"></span><br />
Grace Murray Hopper ranks her place in the list of the most eminent woman in the IT sphere too. She took part in the investigation of the first computer – an electro-mechanical system Mark I.  In the 9th of September, 1945 Grace found a bug (an insect) when she was testing Mark II. Since that incident the testing terminology has been replenished by the new term.</p>
<p>Also she is the author of another widespread term – compiler. COBOL language is her achievement too. She created it in 1959 and since that time Miss Grace Murray Hopper has had  the nickname “COBOL grandmother”.</p>
<p>We have a lot of examples of women’s achievements in the present time. For example, Joanna Rutkowska (Poland) who took part in the development of rootkit- technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.oxagile.com/2009/01/26/the-most-famous-woman-in-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agile: Anarchy Outsource</title>
		<link>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/10/02/agile-anarchy-outsource/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/10/02/agile-anarchy-outsource/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Project management in IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software development methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web developers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oxagile.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
   Many times you and I have heard about advantages of Agile development techniques and drawbacks of traditional “hard” techniques like RUP, MSF and so on. I think, sometimes we are  mixing them up.
A lot of software engineers, project architects and even PMs prefer the Agile approach because of the anarchy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
   <span class = "facebook-like-this" style = "height: px"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/10/02/agile-anarchy-outsource/&layout=standard&show_faces=false&width=100%&action=like&colorscheme=light&locale=en_US&font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100%px; height:px"></iframe></span><p>Many times you and I have heard about advantages of <a href="http://www.oxagile.com/skill_set.html">Agile development techniques</a> and drawbacks of traditional “hard” techniques like RUP, MSF and so on. I think, sometimes we are  mixing them up.<img class="alignright" title="Mess" src="http://www.bradreese.com/images/example-cable-mess.jpg" alt="" width="316" height="237" /></p>
<p>A lot of software engineers, project architects and even PMs prefer the Agile approach because of the anarchy it allows in the outsourcing development. I mean the absence of specifications (even when they are really needed), merge of project roles and responsibilities (when no one can say who is responsible for low quality level and specification), and the sacred belief in users’ stories without any additional analysis of business goals. The situation can become worse if a customer hasn’t got a clear vision what he wants to get at the end of the project, if the requirements weren’t completely described and verified by him and finally they were implemented according to the developers’ point of view. Most probably the client’s expectations will not be satisfied, and it will lead to hours of overtime, release date shifting and other symptoms of an unsuccessful project.</p>
<p>In addition, unskilled key project persons frequently use this fashionable term to clear themselves when they fail, the project deadline is out-of-date and the customer is not satisfied. They say “We create software using modern flexible approaches, we don’t need all these hundreds of specifications and process descriptions! This is Agile, baby, so relax!”, but usually they forget one important thing.</p>
<p>Agile practice is not the universal magic wand that allows you to make any project no matter if it’s low-sized or estimated in 10 thousand man*days, with minimum of documentation, absence of project roadmap, detailed architecture and so on. Of course, it could be so in small/medium projects and on the assumption of all project-members already have agile experience and the Project Manager keeps all working activities and plans in his head. But you have to keep in mind that it’s rather risky to rely on this.</p>
<p>I strongly believe that Agile development process should be used only by <a href="http://www.oxagile.com/">highly-experienced web developers</a> – because they already know the weak points of this methodology and they will not addle with the seeming simplicity and easiness of this approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/10/02/agile-anarchy-outsource/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctrine in a PHP programming</title>
		<link>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/07/06/doctrine-in-a-php-programming/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/07/06/doctrine-in-a-php-programming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripts example]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oxagile.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
   
Home page: www.doctrine-project.org.  Current version: 1.0.2
Doctrine is a PHP ORM for PHP 5.2.3+ that sits on the top of a powerful PHP. One of its key features is the ability to optionally write database queries in an object oriented SQL-dialect called DQL inspired by Hibernates HQL. This provides web developers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
   <span class = "facebook-like-this" style = "height: px"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/07/06/doctrine-in-a-php-programming/&layout=standard&show_faces=false&width=100%&action=like&colorscheme=light&locale=en_US&font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100%px; height:px"></iframe></span><div class="mceTemp"><a href="http://www.doctrine-project.org"><img class="size-full wp-image-84" title="doctrine-logo" src="http://blog.oxagile.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/doctrine-logo.gif" border="0" alt="Doctrine" width="151" height="41" /></a></div>
<p>Home page: <a rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.doctrine-project.org">www.doctrine-project.org</a>.  Current version: 1.0.2</p>
<div class="mceTemp">Doctrine is a PHP ORM for PHP 5.2.3+ that sits on the top of a powerful PHP. One of its key features is the ability to optionally write database queries in an object oriented SQL-dialect called DQL inspired by Hibernates HQL. This provides <a href="http://www.oxagile.com">web developers</a> with a powerful alternative to SQL that maintains a maximum flexibility without requiring needless code duplication.</div>
<p>Doctrine requires PHP 5.2.3+. It doesn&#8217;t require any external libraries. For the database function call abstraction Doctrine uses PDO which comes bundled with the PHP official release that you get from <a style="text-decoration: line-through;" rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.php.net">www.php.net</a>.<br />
<span id="more-73"></span><br />
<strong>Doctrine features:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Supports: MySQL, SQLite, PostgreSQL, Oracle, Mssql, Firebird and Informix.</li>
<li>Supports result caching with Memcache, APC or SQLite.</li>
<li>Supports import/export with YAML schemas, SQL scripts or existing database.</li>
<li>Has DQL (Doctrine Query Language) it helping users in complex object retrieval.</li>
<li>Supports migration functionality. For making a migration process easy.</li>
<li>Has integrated searching functionality.</li>
</ul>
<p>For more visit <a style="text-decoration: line-through;" rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation">http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation</a></p>
<p><strong>Example:</strong><br />
This example illustrates the way of extracting data from the database table.</p>
<p><em>File structure:<br />
</em><code>Models/<br />
Users.php – user model<br />
Doctrine/ - Doctrine library files<br />
Doctrine.php – Doctrine main file<br />
index.php</code><br />
<em>Example of index.php</em><br />
[source='php']<br />
<?php<br />
// include Dotrine main file.<br />
require_once 'Doctrine.php';</p>
<p>// register Doctrine library file loader.<br />
spl_autoload_register(array('Doctrine','autoload'));</p>
<p>// connect to database<br />
Doctrine_Manager::connection('mysql://user:password@localhost/database');</p>
<p>// set path to models<br />
Doctrine::loadModels('models');</p>
<p>// create simple query on DQL.<br />
$users = Doctrine_Query::create()->from(&#8216;Users&#8217;);</p>
<p>// print result<br />
foreach ($users as $user)<br />
echo $user->email;<br />
?><br />
[/source]</p>
<p><em>Example of Users.php</em><br />
[source='php']<br />
<?php<br />
/**<br />
* User model definition.<br />
*/<br />
class Users extends Doctrine_Record<br />
{<br />
/**<br />
* Define model metadata.<br />
*/<br />
public function setTableDefinition()<br />
{<br />
$this->setTableName(&#8216;users&#8217;);</p>
<p>$this->hasColumn(<br />
&#8216;id&#8217;,<br />
&#8216;integer&#8217;,<br />
4,<br />
array(<br />
&#8216;type&#8217; => &#8216;integer&#8217;,<br />
&#8216;length&#8217; => 11,<br />
&#8216;primary&#8217; => true,<br />
&#8216;autoincrement&#8217; => true<br />
));</p>
<p>$this->hasColumn(<br />
&#8216;email&#8217;,<br />
&#8217;string&#8217;,<br />
255,<br />
array(<br />
&#8216;type&#8217; => &#8217;string&#8217;,<br />
&#8216;length&#8217; => 255,<br />
&#8216;default&#8217; => &#8221;,<br />
&#8216;notnull&#8217; => true<br />
));<br />
}<br />
}<br />
?><br />
[/source]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/07/06/doctrine-in-a-php-programming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should there be a separate methodology for testing?</title>
		<link>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/04/16/should-there-be-a-separate-methodology-for-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/04/16/should-there-be-a-separate-methodology-for-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software development methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.oxagile.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
   There are a lot of words said about web development and functional programming methodologies. Usually they are oriented to development mostly and do not deal very much with testing. So should testing have a separate methodology?
It is not a secret that quality software is one of the most important requirements for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
   <span class = "facebook-like-this" style = "height: px"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/04/16/should-there-be-a-separate-methodology-for-testing/&layout=standard&show_faces=false&width=100%&action=like&colorscheme=light&locale=en_US&font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100%px; height:px"></iframe></span><p>There are a lot of words said about web development and functional programming methodologies. Usually they are oriented to development mostly and do not deal very much with testing. So should testing have a separate methodology?</p>
<p>It is not a secret that quality software is one of the most important requirements for a customer. It often doesn’t matter the timeframe or even the budget of the project, but whether the end users will be pleased with the product developed. So the importance of testing is great and on some projects good testing is even more valuable than good development. Anyway this doesn’t mean that testing should have a separate methodology. As testing is a very agile and flexible process, which closely connected with <a href="http://www.oxagile.com/">web application development</a>, there should be the same methodology for testing as for development.</p>
<p>Testing is flexible enough to choose the best process to achieve the result easily and quickly. It can be various, depending on the development methodology, project team specification and customer’s goals.<br />
If you think of a separate testing methodology – just take all the best practices together and work out your own testing methodology!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.oxagile.com/2008/04/16/should-there-be-a-separate-methodology-for-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

